buying a new rifle scope, which is better the Burris Fullfield II or Bushnell Elite 3200, both 3-9×40?

November 16th, 2009 riflescope Posted in Hunting | 7 Comments »

jamesrs52 asked:


Anyone have experience with these two scopes?

Tags: , , ,


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

7 Responses to “buying a new rifle scope, which is better the Burris Fullfield II or Bushnell Elite 3200, both 3-9×40?”

  1. C.J I Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 5:30 am

    by friend has the 3200. He says its really good. But no experience with burris.

  2. americanschoolofcorr Says:
    November 22nd, 2009 at 4:33 am

    Burris is the best quality of optics, bushnell’s is probably cheaper or more sturdy, with lower quality optics and less of a warranty?

  3. Blakemore Says:
    November 22nd, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    The exact one and would not trade it for the world.

  4. balttigger Says:
    November 25th, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    I don’t have any experience with the high end Bushnells or Burrises. My mainstay is the Nikon Prostaff 3-9×40 ($150 everywhere). It gathers as much as the high end Leupolds and holds zero on the harshest calibers.

  5. dca2003311@yahoo.com Says:
    November 28th, 2009 at 8:37 am

    For quality reasonably priced scope with lifetime warranty traditions scope with lifetime warranty traditions scope with lifetime warranty traditions scope com.
    For quality reasonably priced scope com.
    For quality reasonably priced scope with lifetime warranty traditions scope com.

  6. sno f Says:
    November 28th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    personally of these two i would take the bushnell.

  7. r d Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 7:55 am

    BURRIS! Bushnell is kinda cheap.

«
»